ABSTRACT
The most innovative and meaningful recent advances regarding surgery of the cranial
base involve the ability to perform a complete resection followed by a water- and
airtight reconstruction while minimizing facial incisions and morbidity. Perhaps the
first step in this direction took place when the subcranial/subfrontal approach was
introduced for anterior skull base surgery. Originally developed by Raveh in 1978
for the management of severe skull base injuries, these approaches were later adapted
for the treatment of congenital anomalies prior to their utilization for resection
of anterior skull base tumors. The endoscopic approaches are quite practical with
promising long-term efficacy for the treatment of most benign, infectious, and inflammatory
disorders. The minimal recovery time, functional outcomes, and obvious aesthetic advantages
are only tempered by the lack of long-term data regarding the efficacy of these approaches
in the treatment of malignancies.
KEYWORDS
Cranial base - skull base - minimally invasive approaches - endoscopic - craniofacial
resection - subcranial approach
REFERENCES
- 1
Kassam A, Snyderman C H, Mintz A et al..
Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I Crista galli to the sella
turcica.
Neurosurg Focus.
2005;
19
1-12
- 2
Draf W, Schick B, How I.
Do it: endoscopic-microscopic anterior skull base reconstruction.
Skull Base.
2007;
17
59-72
- 3
Raveh J, Vuillemin T.
The surgical one-stage management of combined cranio-maxillo-facial and frontobasal
fractures. Advantages of the subcranial approach in 374 cases.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg.
1988;
16
160-172
- 4
Laedrach K, Annino D, Raveh J et al..
Advanced approaches to cranio-orbital injuries.
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am.
1995;
3
107-129
- 5
Eloy J A, Shohet M R, Bederson J B et al..
Intracranial mucocele: an unusual complication of cerebrospinal fluid leakage repair
with middle turbinate mucosal graft.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2007;
137
350-352
- 6 Raveh J, Laedrach K, Vuillemin T.
Craniofacial congenital anomalies: the subcranial approach. In: Bosniak S Principles and Practice of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Vol. 2. Philadelphia, PA; WB Saunders Company 1996: 1163-1177
- 7
Raveh J, Laedrach K, Speiser M et al..
The subcranial approach for fronto-orbital and anteroposterior skull base tumors.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1993;
119
385-393
- 8
Snyderman C H, Kassam A B, Carrau R C et al..
Endoscopic reconstruction of cranial base defects following endonasal skull base surgery.
Skull Base.
2007;
17
73-78
- 9
Day T A, Vuillemin T, Lädrach K et al..
Calvarial bone grafting in craniofacial reconstruction.
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am.
1995;
3
241-255
- 10
Cheney M L, Varvares M A, Nadol Jr J B.
The temporoparietal fascial flap in head and neck reconstruction.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1993;
119
618-623
Michael R ShohetM.D.
Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai
School of Medicine
620 Columbus Avenue, Second Floor, New York, NY 10029